Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1038

reference
20-tree-1
name
1038
tree-preservation-order

undefined

20-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.021649 50.876610)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.021606 50.876605,-1.021608 50.876614,-1.021614 50.876621,-1.021623 50.876627,-1.021635 50.876631,-1.021648 50.876633,-1.021673 50.876628,-1.021683 50.876622,-1.021689 50.876614,-1.021691 50.876606,-1.021690 50.876598,-1.021684 50.876590,-1.021674 50.876584,-1.021663 50.876580,-1.021649 50.876579,-1.021636 50.876580,-1.021624 50.876584,-1.021615 50.876590,-1.021608 50.876597,-1.021606 50.876605)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL